Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

You know what would have way more impact on housing affordability? Build it using traditional construction methods but make it 10 stories instead of 4 stories.

But the city will find some reason why that's absolutely unacceptable. Then they will go on to talk about how this is just fundamentally a difficult problem that they haven't found a solution for, but rest assured they are still looking for ways to solve it.




There is a practical aspect to building height. Berkeley is on an earthquake fault line, and buildings in the 6-15 storey range have a natural resonance that tends to match the frequency of earthquake waves.

I'm having difficulty finding references to this, so maybe it's not as big a deal as I thought?

http://www.bgs.ac.uk/discoveringGeology/hazards/earthquakes/...


The breakpoints have more to do with other parts of building codes. Wood framing is only strong enough to support three floors (unless you use cross laminated timber, which is a relatively new construction technology). Furthermore there are increasing requirements for fire suppression and accessibility as you add height. The breakpoints are basically either 2-floor duplex through quadplex that don't need elevators, or putting three floors of wood-framed apartments over a concrete or steel podium that contains commercial space and parking. Podium construction basically explains why so many 4 and 5 floor buildings get put up - it's significantly cheaper than the more expensive material required to make stuff strong enough for taller buildings.


Isn't the land a lot of the cost? Why isn't it worthwhile to spend 3x on construction and collect from 2x as many occupants?


Depends on the location. In the Bay Area a large portion of the cost is having your capital tied up for like 5+ years while trying to get your project approved.


That's not a real excuse. Tokyo is crisscrossed with fault-lines and they manage to build to quake code --the proof being all the healthy buildings despite frequent quakes.

Berkeley is just putting up excuses.


That was certainly our experience here.

"Wellington's mid-rise buildings worst affected by earthquake" https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&object...

NB, the defence headquarters building, and the statistics building mentioned in the article have since been demolished.


I thought buildings can be reinforced. How does Tokyo manage it's buildings?



YIMBY has its limits. We all need to start looking at policies that dis-incentivize keeping empty units as speculative investments.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: