Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
Writer for iPad: First Reactions (informationarchitects.jp)
17 points by slig on Oct 8, 2010 | hide | past | favorite | 18 comments



I don't know about how that font looks on the iPad, but my first reaction looking at it on my laptop was that it looks extremely awkward with those thick character-wide serifs. I know this is a bikesheddy thing to bitch about, but I'd personally be less distracted if Writer stuck with a familiar monospace font like Vera, Monaco, or Consolas...or if, as drcode mentioned, it used a proportional font.


Am i the only one that finds it ironic that they basically recreated a typewriter?


It's not ironic, it's conscious. The typewriter was the blue print for the app. It was supposed to be called writing machine (from German Schreibmaschine = typewriter).


ok, so that's super informative. In my life, i've had a few trysts with writing and ended up buying an Olivetti when i was in college. that's been a good investment and it has also had the effect (which i find positive) of slowing down the speed that i type at and making me more thoughtful about how i write (i have a two color, non-correcting ribbon). My love for that flawed device is probably similar to model m keyboard affection.

Writer seems, conceptually, like using an old ibm word processor (remember those with the one/four line text display that would then typewrite that onto the page?) It seems like a sophisticated version of that. maybe with the new printing in ios 4.2, you could make a usb-teletype that would print out the document you had just written. (aside: i would love a usb-teletype printer)

still, props to y'all for making that leap. i don't have an ipad, otherwise i'd probably have some other comments.


Some people call that innovation.


So far I like it, but I definitely miss Elements-style autosyncing. Switching to my main computer and then having to switch back in order to manually sync my work is sub-optimal.


I've become very partial to PlainText myself.


I love monospace fonts when I'm coding... but writing regular English text in monospace sound excruciatingly tedious.


What's the difference between coding and writing a careful solid consistent text?


Reading monospace text sucks.

It's only good for coding for alignment issues. But reading monospace characters for long blocks of text is hard on the eyes. (Not to mention that proportional spacing is more efficient -- you can get more text on a line with roughly the same letter forms.)


I've taken to setting whatever IDE or editor I'm using to have comments in italic Helvetica, rather Menlo, my fixed width font of choice. It makes comments easier to read, and I find myself writing slightly more of them as a result.


It's not about reading, it's about writing. Many measures in writer came from studying coding programs.


I dunno about you, but I barely type when I'm coding. I'd guess about 90% of my day is reading and thinking.


We only use monospace because there is a lot of symmetry in code, and unlike other forms of writing, a single punctuation characters can completely change the meaning of the text (/.!^,;).


Most of the need for monospace in coding is for the sake of indentation and alignment. If you have any ASCII diagrams (see the Internet RFC's) you need monospace.

But we forget how much of this is a circumstance of history. Teletypes were monospace, like typewriters, for mechanical simplicity. Line printers and DecWriters were monospace for the same reason. Then the first video terminals and eventually the original IBM PC were all monospace, all for the same reason, and because of familiarity. We simply got used to monospace and came to depend on it. There is no inherent virtue of monospace.

Come to think of it, the first (mainstream) computer I remember with proportional fonts was the original Mac in 1984.


The idea of using a monospaced font was to invite the writer to conscious slowness. Reading typography needs speed and ease, writing needs care and precision.


I really like the concept and the unique focus features. However, I don't have an iPad (yet) so I hope they come out with a web app or desktop application version.


Yes, we will. Hopefully before Christmas. BTW: We're looking for Cocoa developers... http://www.informationarchitects.jp/en/work-ia/




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: