Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Failed in terms of science spending maybe, but even if they found everything they wanted the intrinsic value of this new knowledge to society is not really valuable in the same sense that the steel needed for the construction is valued.

It is now more than 20 years since the top quark was discovered, has society profited enought from knowing the mass of the top quark that the Tevatron is paid off?

Or is this way of thinking of science funding just destructive?



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: