Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Yeah, a big part of the problem is that the military has blended R&D into their procurement programs.

It's a recipe for every ambitious, failed research idea to look like a clusterfuck boondoggle.




The old way of having contracters compete with designs and the loser getting $0 isn't possible when costs are this high. You need a guaranteed market or nobody will participate.


Pay companies to submit a design...


The F-35 was the result of such a program. Lockheed and Boeing were each give a billion dollars and a set of requirements and told to make the best plane possible.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_Strike_Fighter_program


Lockheed Martin was payed to do the original design (X35). They've done as you wanted.


It's not like the costs are some weird artifact of time itself, they come from specifying capabilities 25 years before they exist.

But sacred cow programs that are too big to cut are good for all the people that make the decisions.


Capabilities are not inevitable. You have to create R&D programs to bring them to fruition. Is the complaint here that its rolled up under the same line item?


Capabilities are not inevitable.

Yes exactly. The complaint is that the integrated development-procurement process proceeds as if they are.

For instance, https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2018/02/16/report-e... while they work on building the JFK.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: