Well, any time I need something from a gov and it isn't in the language it wants to see, it just closes shop on me. Even if the language is english and everybody understands it, except the official, who is "just following the law". So we have to go to an official translator, pay through the nose to get something trivial done. Or forget it.
Is the court suggesting, with this verdict, the cops do the same? Seems like a reversal of the usual gov policy to me.
Furthermore, in this situation non-verbal communications take over and should be considered. If the defendant knew the law he would have signalled "no" (while saying "no"), or positioned himself as to block access (if possible).
Is the court suggesting, with this verdict, the cops do the same? Seems like a reversal of the usual gov policy to me.
Furthermore, in this situation non-verbal communications take over and should be considered. If the defendant knew the law he would have signalled "no" (while saying "no"), or positioned himself as to block access (if possible).