This is not ingenious in my opinion ... I’ve been at a company for a year that had bought into “Watson” — when I suggested alternatives to the specific apis being used was told in no uncertain terms that they had been consulted and they were going with “Watson” ...

Now a year later I’m finally being asked to clarify “what is Watson” so that the decision makers can better understand the techniques being used rather than the fantasies about what was being used that they were encouraged to develop through misleading marketing and consultants ...