What they are offering is actually very simple, and systematic.

While the list of foods containing fodmaps has changed a lot lately, there are several sources that are up to date. University of Michigan has a lot of reliable resources.

The system is described in full here: http://www.myginutrition.com/diet.html (U of M)

They also have a pinterest that has tons of ideas and specific brands they've tested... Which is here: https://www.pinterest.com/UMGIdietitians/

Full list of foods here: http://www.myginutrition.com/downloads/Low_FODMAP_foods.pdf

The warning my dietitian has given me, is that many of the websites out there are using out of date information pertaining to foods; and that I should only trust their lists.

You just put this startup out of business. The Michigan Uni website and video tutorials are more complete than Caelum's mvp. Couldn't figure out how to get Caelum's website to work, it just dumped me into a food log todo-style app with no info how to use it.

Our core value currently is the 1-on-1 coaching, so the MVP app is meant to support the coaching service (and currently working on building out the content). Michigan has some great content, but it’s a different experience than having a coach or dietitian. It could be supplemental to a dietitian - sounds like this is the use case for trowway21. There are definitely people out there who want to do the diet with content/info only, and our service wouldn’t be a good fit for them.

Thanks for your feedback on finding the app disorienting - that’s helpful for us to know as we improve it moving forwards.

I feel like your pricing is off. $29/week is too expensive for consumers, yet far too cheap if you plan to get reimbursed from insurers. Especially considering you'll need a lot of people and show improvements for them if you want insurers to pay - this pricepoint won't let that happen.

If you compare that to paying for a dietitian, it's actually not TOO bad. BUT, I think churn will be high due to price.

I could see a declining fee model. Just a thought.

We are trying a low FODMAP for my wife. I could see her paying for it for 2-3 months, then we would probably find that expensive at $29/w...but, if after 3 months, it went down to say $29 per month, then it would totally make sense as we would use it a lot less, I think.

At least if we compare to when she stopped gluten, lactose and a few other things 6 years ago...the worst was the first 2-3 months.

A dietitian is a different service though. Registered dietitians are trained, accredited professionals that can legally give you medical advice. This service will not give you medical advice.

Also good thought on a pricing model that declines after the first several months - definitely something we're considering introducing.

> If you compare that to paying for a dietitian, it's actually not TOO bad. BUT, I think churn will be high due to price.

Could the high pricing be because this is really a guide to a solution -- once customers have need for a guide, they'll stop using the service; that is, churn is naturally built in due to the nature of the service.

Same thoughts here. I don't have too much time to chit chat with the trainer there, I know it's required but for example I would keep exchanges to a minimum.

We've actually toyed with having a version without the coach that's quite a bit cheaper (~9/month) - is that something you'd find more compelling?

My gf has lots of problems with various foods and manages to keep on top of it fairly well - although she has very little concrete evidence about what it actually is that is causing the problems.

I could see her trialling a comprehensive ($30 a week) package for a few weeks, then dropping to a less intensive (~$10 a week) package that kept her on the right track.

I personally don't think she would pay $30 a week unless the service gave her a significant material difference in lifestyle (which I certainly imagine it could have the potential to do).

What would it do? I looked (probably too) briefly...and thought the the main value was mostly the coach. Or at least, the value I saw that I was "OMG, we need this in French _now_".

It would have some expanded functionality to take the place of the coach - it would give turn-by-turn directions each day on what to eat, and educate the user on how to avoid FODMAPs / other eating options. But it would have less customization (at least at first), and the user obviously wouldn't be able to get questions answered in the same way

Gotcha. So that could make sense. Someone could start with the coaching, then downgrade to this option instead of just cancelling due to price once they don't use the coaching services enough.

i.e., it would help you with churn a bit, I think.

As any new project that pops up in here, I wish you well and hope you guys make it.

However, as a IBS sufferer, I'm not sure I get it.

Yes identifying the foods that make you ill is a top priority for IBS patients like me, but I downloaded this app:

https://www.monashfodmap.com/i-have-ibs/get-the-app/

And within a week or two I identified the culprits, took them out of my diet and I'm back in business all for I think it was a one time payment of $6.99 and some willingness to make some changes. The app is fantastic.

I guess what you are really selling is the coaching and I'm sure some people do need it. Good luck guys

Your terms state that "The services are not medical advice or treatment". If that is the case then this service is operating in a legal grey area where customers could be under the impression that medical advice is being given out and could sue Caelum Health if the diet does have a negative impact on their health. And if the customer knows it isn't medical advice, then they should run the advice past a medical professional on a regular basis which kind of defeats the purpose of the service.

That language is intended to indicate that we’re not a physician, hospital, drug company, etc. - pretty standard for companies in our space.

But you’re right that, similar to drugs, dieticians, or physical therapy, we’re not a substitute for a doctor - in fact, one of the ways our users find is through referrals from their doctor.

But unlike FDA approved drugs, registered dietitians and licensed physical therapists your service is not accredited and can't legally give the advice that it claims to give. As an example Ohio state law says that "only licensed dietitians can practice dietetics".

Practising dietetics is defined as including "Nutritional assessment to determine nutritional needs and to recommend appropriate nutritional intake" and "Nutritional counseling or education as components of preventive, curative, and restorative health care"

Either your service isn't doing those things (and outwardly it seems it is) or the service must be provided by a licensed dietitian to customers in Ohio or it is breaking Ohio state law.

[1] http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/4759

We've worked with our lawyers on this topic and so far we're in good shape. But it's definitely something we need to keep an eye on as we introduce new functionality / try out different marketing.

Can you speak a bit about how this is regulated? Are you working with the FDA Digital Health group?

The FDA is currently selectively regulating mobile apps, primarily based on risk categorization. We haven't been subject to regulation so far, but will of course work with any regulatory bodies if/when that time comes (and, of course, regulation of digital health products is continuously evolving).

I would suggest taking a more proactive approach in your relationship with the FDA, perhaps hiring an experienced consultant to either help you work with the FDA (the new "Pre-Cert" program might be worthwhile) or dial back your marketing claims to a safer position.

Right here on this Show HN you've said "Caelum is a digital therapeutic for Irritable Bowel Syndrome." This statement makes clear that you're intending for this to be used in the treatment of a specific disease (so this is a medical device and is subject to FD&C Act).

You're also said you're providing "1-on-1 digital coaching" and more specifically you "personalize each patient’s program based on their eating habits, past food trials, and demographics (age, gender, ethnicity, etc)" (so specific treatment regimens). "Minimal risk" for the FDA generally excludes individualized treatment regimens. There may be sufficient grounds to support oversight.

Thanks, will bring up these points with our advisers in this area

I have a long lasting gastritis and would love to try you guys out. I am wondering if I should wait for the lactose/fructose/sorbit tests or not.

Another question is I already have a huge list of things I tried, can I just feed those in?

Getting started isn't dependent on any particular lab testing - the low-FODMAP diet includes elimination of lactose/fructose/sorbitol, so as you follow your plan you'll figure out if those are triggers for you.

For the things you've already done, you can tell your coach it'll be incorporated into your plan.

Oh god, love it! This is not that expensive if you compare to having someone helping you that you pay for, and need to get a meeting with.

On the business side, I would assume churn will be pretty high after a few months.

Yup, this is the comparison we see - alternative is going to a dietitian, which is very expensive. Re: your other post on people potentially churning after 2-3 months - we've actually seen strong retention, but leaving after 2-3 months is certainly a use case we've seen as well. Those users tend to have gotten a lot of value from the product, and are also profitable for us - overall not a bad outcome

Cool project and great idea! Unfortunately your website falls a bit short on selling me though. And at $29/week after the free trial I don't even want to find out if I love your app, because then I would know exactly what I was missing out on after having to cancel based on price.

Glad you like the idea! Thanks for the feedback about the website. Would love to learn more - is there a particular part that especially falls short (or something that, if included, would have sold you)?

One example which is as simple as possible as complicated as necessary would be great.

Gotcha, that makes a lot of sense - appreciate it

When we get back from vacation my wife is absolutely subscribing. Its a step up from dieticians (who guve worksheets and meet in person) since the app looks like it will make everything much more streamlined.

That's great! Look forward to having your wife on board

Do you all have plans to support ulcerative colitis or the SCD diet?

We're building the platform so that it can support any diet, and UC/Crohn's are on our short list. (Some folks with those conditions have benefited from the Low-Fodmap diet too, although it wasn't designed for that purpose.)

thanks lauren. good luck with your company.

Do you consider yourself a covered entity? If not, what kind of data are you collecting about your users?

Cost? It is not showing me the cost when I click on free trial. Could be a bug, using Chrome.

The cost ($29/month) should be displayed both on our homepage and when the user gets to the payment screen in the sign up flow.

If this is a bug obviously want to track it down - where exactly did you click?

just sent to one of my best friends who has been suffering for years. I hope it can help

Thanks for sending along! Hope we can help.