But when most of the commonly used "regular expression" libraries aren't regular, I think if you really mean solving something with only regular expressions, you should probably specify that explicitly. The term's been corrupted enough that using it by itself to rule out things like backreferences isn't clear communication.
That's a shame, because regular grammars have a very important property: they're processed with a Finite State Automaton. This makes them blazing fast and quite memory efficient. (Heck, even with a non-deterministic one they're fast.)
Which is very computer-science-y approach, and totally uninteresting at that,
because the (?PARNO) syntax is still embedded in the same regexp engine for
any practical purpose or distinction.
If you didn't know, a regexp engine with capture groups is already stronger
than what in formal languages theory is called "regular expressions".
