I get your point. Only caveat is corporations also create jobs and pay their workers, but you and I as individuals do not.
I know lots of Apple workers (directly or indirectly) are in China, but I wanted to point out why it's inappropriate to compare personal and corporate taxes.
> I get your point. Only caveat is corporations also create jobs and pay their workers, but you and I as individuals do not.
That's like saying the wheat creates work for the mill to make flour.
You can't have one without the other. Can we just get rid of the ridiculous notion that corporations provide more than the workers doing the actual work?
I don't think it is. If the > workers DOING THE ACTUAL WORK are able to provide more value than the corporation, then why are they working for the corporation instead of providing more value than the corporation by themselves; and paying themselves more than the corporation pays them? I think OP's argument could be an example of reductio ad absurdum.
The balance of power remains at the management level of a corporation, despite the fact that management hardly "does the work" that workers hired would be doing.
The same arguments applied to the peasantry of the feudal age. There are many more peasants than lords, but through an imbalance of power (military in the feudal age, and monetary in the modern age), the higher ups gets to claim the profits of the workers.
I know lots of Apple workers (directly or indirectly) are in China, but I wanted to point out why it's inappropriate to compare personal and corporate taxes.