Being lazy is natural and it is what pushes humanity forward. We don't want to do things, so we try to work on it less in the future - automating things, improving efficiency etc.
Being "lazy" about some things is good for you. Do not focus much on stuff which is not very important for you personally.
Hmm, I don't know about that, I see at least three different character types:
1) those who want to avoid labour, the lazy, some of whom are driven to invention to reduce their labour in order to have more leisure;
2) those who are happy to work in the current system, the content, they get on and do what's needed;
3) those who want to reduce their direct labour in the current system in order to "labour" in other ways, the driven, they want to automate daily living so they can work on other things;
There are subgroups within these for example "the lazy" has a group who will accept a lower quality of life in order to reduce labour, and a group who will prefer to use other people's labour to reduce their own, etc., etc..
Did you read the article? The premise of her question is that she thinks she is lazy AND she is not satisfied with that. Clearly, being "lazy" is not good if your laziness makes you unhappy.
What if the laziness is not a problem, but feeling unhappy because of this laziness? Why you should be unhappy? Billions of people are lazy and they love it.
There are lot of people preaching that being "efficient" all your life is what you should aim for and, weirdly, everyone accepts this as unquestionable truth.
Being "lazy" about some things is good for you. Do not focus much on stuff which is not very important for you personally.