The attitude towards debugging is dismissive -- and I'm not the only one to have drawn that conclusion. Indeed, it's the original author of this article who came across that and drew that inference -- one that I (obviously) share. To flip this around: do you think that the work outlined in the original article is work that should be expected of anyone wishing to debug the kernel?

I think there is room for reasonable people to disagree reasonably about most issues. Flip that around?

Linux is a long way from being the buggiest OS kernel I've ever used, how about you? Perhaps they've found and fixed some bugs? Perhaps they've prevented some from being written? Perhaps their approach is something that can be disagreed with, even strongly so, on the grounds of being less than optimal without suggesting that it has zero merit and by extension its proponents are somehow to be considered with derision? The inference that anyone hacking any OS kernel is too stupid to understand a differing idea is probably not necessary and unlikely to be justified in my humble opinion. You may of course reasonably disagree and maybe one of us did understand something the other did not on the point? Anyway this is now dull.

But don't be less opinionated, that would be the wrong response!

> Perhaps their approach is something that can be disagreed with, even strongly so, on the grounds of being less than optimal without suggesting that it has zero merit

If a yes or no attitude results in fewer bugfixes, all else equal, then that attitude does have exactly zero merit.