Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I suspect they have given up on crimes where there is little or no evidence and hence not much chance of a conviction.



If you don't look for evidence you're unlikely to find it.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/met-police-spendi...


Officer warns change could have 'horrendous' impact on victims of offences including burglary and car crime

Well I would expect them to say that, turkeys don't vote for Christmas.


Yep, if you make the tiniest possible cuts to our budget we will stop doing our jobs. As if they spent much effort on minor property crimes before.


They have been cuting the uk police budget year on year for ages - this isn't a one off cut.


They have been cuting the uk police budget year on year for ages

Police numbers are now back where they were in the early 00's. Yes there have been cuts, but only from a historic high in 2009. But if crime really is reducing, then we need fewer police anyway, and if it's not, the police should be focussing what resources they do have on serious crimes. Not "things people say on Twitter" (or "cybercrime" as they call it)


Source for numbers?

Half the "police" I see are PCSOs or "Traffic Officers" (who appear to be impersonating police AFAICT) are they included in figures?

In our UK city we don't have traffic wardens (who were part of the police authority I gather), instead there are private parking attendants and PCSOs do an occasional blitz.

Police used to be regularly on patrol in the town centre, but there's only volunteers and private security now; maybe that's atypical.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-36857326

The absolute numbers of police is not the issue, it's how they are allocated or how they choose to spend their time. Policing random people being mean to celebrities on Twitter seems to be a lot easier than walking the best...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: