Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"..make designers less dependent on their software (if it suddenly stops working, you should still have a chance to use your files somehow)..."(source=link) Makes your "..Will you charge me $1000 in two years, once I become dependent?.." invalid


I don't think it does. Words are words.


doesn't it? I don't understand edit: ignore the 1000$ part. what i mean is that one focus of the product is to make designer less dependent because there won't be a new file format for example. but cpks was talking about the danger of becoming dependent. thats what i didn't get




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: