Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Nope.

His letter point is clearly about widely(1) known debate(2) between him and Linus Torvalds, and ego massage.

(1) widely, if you arent 25 years old proverbial "javascript developer" ;-) - as the debate took place in 1992.

(2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanenbaum%E2%80%93Torvalds_deb...




It's certainly a joking jab at that debate, and while I'm sure he can appreciate the irony of overtaking Linux this way, stroking his own ego is not what this is about. He doesn't need that.

I think the reason he posts this is that, just like everybody else, he's not happy about Intel secretly introducing a massive security hole in their processors. Telling him they were using Minix on such a massive scale would have been polite, but it would also have informed Tanenbaum that Intel was running a secret OS on their processors.

What Intel did was not only foolish and harmful, it was also impolite. Plenty of people are addressing the foolish and harmful parts already, but the impolite part can only really be addressed by AST.


"stroking his own ego is not what this is about. He doesn't need that."

Forgive me for interjecting politics into this debate, but we all know at this point that there is at least one highly successful egotist in this world who still needs to have his ego stroked on a regular (daily) basis. I admire Tanenbaum and doubt that he fits into this category, but the category does exist.


I honestly can't tell if you mean Trump or Torvalds.


It has to be Torvalds. They said "highly successful".


From your Wikipedia link:

"I would like to close by clearing up a few misconceptions and also correcting a couple of errors. First, I REALLY am not angry with Linus. HONEST. He's not angry with me either. I am not some kind of "sore loser" who feels he has been eclipsed by Linus. MINIX was only a kind of fun hobby for me. I am a professor. I teach and do research and write books and go to conferences and do things professors do. I like my job and my students and my university. [...] I wrote MINIX because I wanted my students to have hands-on experience playing with an operating system. After AT&T forbade teaching from John Lions' book, I decided to write a UNIX-like system for my students to play with. [...] I was not trying to replace GNU/HURD or Berkeley UNIX. Heaven knows, I have said this enough times. I just wanted to show my students and other students how you could write a UNIX-like system using modern technology. A lot of other people wanted a free production UNIX with lots of bells and whistles and wanted to convert MINIX into that. I was dragged along in the maelstrom for a while, but when Linux came along, I was actually relieved that I could go back to professoring. [...] Linus seems to be doing excellent work and I wish him much success in the future.

While writing MINIX was fun, I don't really regard it as the most important thing I have ever done. It was more of a distraction than anything else. The most important thing I have done is produce a number of incredibly good students, especially Ph.D. students. See my home page for the list. They have done great things. I am as proud as a mother hen. To the extent that Linus can be counted as my student, I'm proud of him, too. Professors like it when their students go on to greater glory."


Speaking of ego:

"if you arent 25 years old proverbial "javascript developer" ;-)"

Why is this necessary?


We all need a massage from time to time.


Gotta stroke that grey beard


The same reason Vi versus Emacs internet arguments are necessary.


ed all the way!

[this comment was written in Lynx]


Ed! Ed! Ed is the standard text editor!

https://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/ed-msg.html


Why is this necessary? It's just a little joke.


I would think qualifying a claim of such scope as "widely known" would be very much necessary.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: