> We are not as interested in smaller revenue focused companies that aim to be sold for $25mm to $50mm ... Even so, we will certainly end up with more than a few companies that will sell in that range. That is a successful outcome for us too if we can own 15-20% of the business and have less than $5mm invested, which is the case for many of our companies.
At the high end, $5mm invested at 20% would mean a post-money valuation of $25 million. That's 1-2X. Or am I misunderstanding this?
Though, the multiplier doubles as the amount invested at 20% halves. Since most of their investments seem to be further away from $5 million, that could be what I'm overlooking.
Is Dave the 1st investor to explicitly say and invest in pre-product/market fit companies? I though First Round Capital also did that but the sense that I get from reading FRC team blogs is that they are quite hot on investing only after customer acquisitions costs are lower than life time value I.e. After they have proven fit.
I love that Dave McClure was able to put together a $30 million dollar fund. I like the idea of investments being made pre product/market fit, with subsequent double down investments once the ideas gain traction.
I like the fact that smaller investments go a great deal in funding tech startups, bootstrapping is more viable now. The iterative approach is also critical since most founders cant build the product in one shot
I wander how Dave's pitch deck look like, when he was raising these $30 mil from institutional investors.
I guess one single slide with the word "fuck" in 30pt font ;)
At the high end, $5mm invested at 20% would mean a post-money valuation of $25 million. That's 1-2X. Or am I misunderstanding this?
Though, the multiplier doubles as the amount invested at 20% halves. Since most of their investments seem to be further away from $5 million, that could be what I'm overlooking.