Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Eh, couldn't you make the argument that the Cookie warnings showed that a government body could meaningfully change the experience of the internet? As small as the warnings are, had anything like it been done before?



Sure, now we get annoying warnings on every website we visit....


Because the UK intentionally built a loophole into their version of the law.

The actual original cookie law, that was decided on EU level, requires users actually to be able to opt out.

But it was a directive, and so countries could interpret it for local implementations.

The GDPR is a regulation, which means its text is directly law, and it also means it can be a lot stricter.


Not so much a loophole but the UK Information Commissioner certainly adopted a more relaxed approach to enforcement of the requirements of the cookie law compared to other countries.

And the law required prior informed consent to cookies with opt-out not generally being considered to be valid consent.


Talking from experience from a "new" EU country with solid IT scene: the "cookie law" is not enforced at all. Google would be probably the only one theoretically enforcing it (most of websites do show a message because they use Google Analytics), but it would go against Google's interest, so they are not really enforcing it either.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: