However, only levels DH3 and upwards follow the model of including the previous levels and adding enhancements, the first 2 levels are another mini-hierarchy, and DH2 is almost a category on it's own. Perhaps this might be modelled better with a dimension-level mapping. This also follows the ethos, pathos and logos.
This will allow analysis and levelling of each form of argument:
DH0 -> DE:0
DH1 -> DE:1
DH2 -> DP:0
DH3 -> DL:0
DH4 -> DL:1
DH5 -> DL:2
DH6 -> DL:3
I also like the concept of DH7 which explicitly argues against the strongest form of the statement.
DH7 -> DL:4
However, only levels DH3 and upwards follow the model of including the previous levels and adding enhancements, the first 2 levels are another mini-hierarchy, and DH2 is almost a category on it's own. Perhaps this might be modelled better with a dimension-level mapping. This also follows the ethos, pathos and logos.
This will allow analysis and levelling of each form of argument: DH0 -> DE:0 DH1 -> DE:1 DH2 -> DP:0 DH3 -> DL:0 DH4 -> DL:1 DH5 -> DL:2 DH6 -> DL:3
I also like the concept of DH7 which explicitly argues against the strongest form of the statement. DH7 -> DL:4