Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

As I have said elsewhere on this page, there´s an easy litmus test for who has actually read the headlined message. Those people are not asking the "But but but rsync?" questions; are talking about "ruptime" and "rwho" as well; know exactly where in the source tree the manual pages are, because the headlined message is a patch that gives their pathnames; and are not basing their arguments on the idea that these are not in ports, given what the deprecation notice explicitly says.

* https://reviews.freebsd.org/D11345




I think you meant to reply to a different comment. None of that is relevant here.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: