Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Its a geometric series. In math: Let r=(1-reserve requirement) and Total = 1000 * sum(1-r^n,n=0,infinity) = 1000 * 1/(1-r)

Now I'm probably wrong with my indices because I'm a little confused about connecting my infinite sum to people running around at the bank. If I plut in .8 for r (the same as the comment above used, I get 1/(1-.8)=5, or $5,000 so I'm right that far. For 10% its: 1/(1-.9) = 10 or $10,000. So the author is right in numbers, but arguing against this would be ridiculous. How could any bank guard against this? Why would they want to?




I didn't say a bank would want to guard against this; I just said that a 10% capital requirement isn't really a 10% capital requirement.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: