>Using Electron may have accelerated the process but let's not pretend that the author is going to rewrite it in something more performant once a little traction is gained.
If we also dont pretend that the sort of people complaining are anything but a distraction.
Because nothing is stopping them from writing something they like better, except off course skill, attitude and discipline. Thankfully they are able to contribute something much more valuable: opinions.
So, yeah. Maybe its a resource hog. Its still interesting and far superior to resource friendly version with the same feature set due to it having the awesome feature of actually existing.
> Because nothing is stopping them from writing something they like better, except off course skill, attitude and discipline. Thankfully they are able to contribute something much more valuable: opinions.
If people don't want feedback, then they shouldn't post on HN. HN is a place where plenty of people provide opinions whether others like it or not. If that's not something people want, then they shouldn't be here.
As for making something better. Better solutions already exist. Terminal emulators are an already solved problem. What terminal emulator problem will be solved that hasn't already been solved by urxvt, KiTTY, Serial, or any of the other Electron based terminals like Magnesium or Hyper?
That's not to say people shouldn't try as there are many reasons to do so. To suggest that opinions are somehow less valuable than yet another implementation of a terminal emulator written in a bloated framework based on a language that was designed in 11 days just to animate web page elements - and that people should reinvent the wheel or shut up... well that's just like, your opinion, man.
>What terminal emulator problem will be solved that hasn't already been solved by urxvt, KiTTY, Serial, or any of the other Electron based terminals like Magnesium or Hyper?
Well if you clicked the link, you would see a number of original features, including html output support. And i don't think it's fair to say that modern javascript is the same language as the one Brandon Eich designed in 11 days.
But if you think that constitutes 'feedback' -- that wouldn't be my definition.
>If people don't want feedback, then they shouldn't post on HN.
Which is what i generally suggest people do -- not because they don't want feedback, but because most people would simply lose motivation when the majority of people react to the glimmer of the word 'electron' and don't bother to click the link or check out the features.
And you can replace 'electron' with anything really. If somebody writes something in Java, there is a good chance some people will react saying that the JVM is evil or how Java is a horrible enterprise language. If somebody writes something in PHP, they'll get the PHP is a horrible language. If somebody writes something in C, they'll get a 'C is too insecure'. If somebody writes an OS-X app or a Windows app, they'll get feedback about how they picked the wrong OS.
It's feedback in the same way that fat shaming a classical pianist would be feedback. If the same 'feedback' can apply to millions of projects without alteration or requiring any effort to establish whether it's applicable -- that is not feedback, that is just taking the piss on something.
I'm sorry. I don't think i phrased it well enough. I thought this project was quite interesting, because it has interesting new features -- things radically different from the alternatives. Whether those are good or bad ideas could be an interesting discussion.
Instead, it's a thread full of people who didn't actually check it out, but abuse the opportunity to repeat a knee-jerk reaction to electron. It's just feels like going to a concert and instead of people talking about whether they liked the music or not, they just default into fat shaming the singer or something to make themselves feel better about themselves.
>So the only feedback that is permissible is adulation?
I guess we differ on what constitutes 'feedback' -- i didn't see much in this thread that would qualify as such.
If we also dont pretend that the sort of people complaining are anything but a distraction.
Because nothing is stopping them from writing something they like better, except off course skill, attitude and discipline. Thankfully they are able to contribute something much more valuable: opinions.
So, yeah. Maybe its a resource hog. Its still interesting and far superior to resource friendly version with the same feature set due to it having the awesome feature of actually existing.