Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

  Because Flickr photos were tagged and labeled and categorized so efficiently 
  by users, they were highly searchable.

  "That is the reason we bought Flickr—not the community. We didn't give a shit about 
  that. The theory behind buying Flickr was not to increase social connections, it was to
  monetize the image index. It was totally not about social communities or social 
  networking. It was certainly nothing to do with the users."
It is kind of amazing that it did not occur to them that the users were the one who created this index and would have continued to do so.



Agreed. The hubris in that statement is almost palpable. They're essentially saying the didn't give a shit about the cause of the result they were buying.


Welcome to humanity. I doubt Facebook cares a lot of its users as well. They are living off the network effects of an incumbent monopoly.


Seems very similar to DIGG.com's story.


And soon to be Reddit's story with their pending redesign which removes all CSS from subreddits among other things that only serve advertisers rather than the community.


Could we get a source on this? It's very hard to believe Reddit is rolling out a change that removes CSS.

EDIT: Source - https://www.reddit.com/r/modnews/comments/66q4is/the_web_red...

We’re designing a new set of tools to address the challenges with CSS but continue to allow communities to express their identities. These tools will allow moderators to select customization options for key areas of their subreddit across platforms. For example, header images and flair colors will be rendered correctly on desktop and mobile.

We know great things happen when we give users as much flexibility as possible. The menu of options we’ll provide for customization is still being determined. Our starting point is to replicate as many of the existing uses that already exist, and to expand beyond as we evolve.

Sounds like they're trying to keep the same flexibility as the existing CSS options, which is a bit different than removing styling.

On the other hand, there are a lot of concerns with the approach Reddit is taking: https://www.reddit.com/r/modnews/comments/66q4is/the_web_red...


Meh, it's time someone knocked them off their perch. It's the same with all these platforms. They all degrade after a few years. Their priorities change from providing a valuable service to squeezing every red cent they can out of their platform. That was probably always the plan but as soon as your agenda switches away from providing for your users, you're trash and it's just a function of time before people start jumping ship.


As far as I can tell, the custom CSS is holding reddit back from any type of optimization/modernization of the HTML markup. Removing it and adding other customization options could actually improve the experience while still allowing subreddits to make changes.


I've always found the css to be annoying (and force remove it with res), never mind that it doesn't work at all on mobile.


What really?!? Completely removing all the sub-reddit CSS will kill so much of the individual subreddit personalities.


It seems very out of touch when we have things like /r/place that would not be possible without CSS


/r/place isn't possible for community created subreddits. You can only do css, with limited hacks with placing stuff in the sidebar content.


That's quite a bit of conjecture!


Then refute it; you won't.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: