Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It is not just South Carolina. My home state of Michigan probably has more fresh water than just about any other state but it still has become a political issue and not just in Flint.

Giant Nestle is pumping tens of millions of gallons in a rural Northern Michigan county in exchange for a $200 yearly permit. Even though the promised jobs never materialized they want to pump even more water threatening the aquifer. The community and the state say no but Nestle is not backing down.

http://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2017/04/19/ne...




That is cheap. In California, those millions of gallons cost Nestlé $524 -- a 262% increase over Michigan.

http://www.lamag.com/citythinkblog/nestle-gets-away-pumping-...


The total ground water withdrawal in Michigan [mainly for agricultural use] is 98,000 Million gallons [1]. Why is Nestle extracting 100 Million a problem?

[1] -http://www.michigan.gov/documents/mdard/2015_MAEAP_Water_Use...


You're comparing the usage of an entire state to the demands placed on a single aquifer.


I agree. However that is not a price issue. Further the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality site specific review said it was okay.

I am genuinely confused why people think this is an issue.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: