Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This is also dangerous for consultants. I always ended up working for one well paying customer who used up all my time. When that customer goes away you have to pretty much start from scratch.



Most of my indie-or-small-team consultant peers have an anchor client that drives 90%+ of their revenue. And most of them make substantially better money than I do, as their billing utilization rates can be nearly perfect.

I'm admittedly slightly envious, as I have to work quite a bit harder for each dollar of revenue and my utilization rates are more in line with traditional professional services firms.

I do, however, take comfort knowing that my largest customer is ~8% of my annual revenue. I feel like I have a more sustainable and resilient business. And I think business development is something that needs to be happening all the time, not just when the threat of imminent starvation looms.

Another unexpected benefit of this arrangement is that I can walk away from "bad revenue". Since I'm not under pressure to grow or feed the beast of a substantial payroll, I've been able to start being more selective about the projects I take on. Once you've been in this business awhile, you can spot bear traps ahead of time, but that only matters if you're able to maneuver around them.


I think you have much better chance long term and you can probably scale up if you want to do so. With the anchor client you are stuck in a very comfortable place but you can't raise rates, you can't do different things or hire people.


And worse, even as a consultant, you have a sample size of 1 with which to base all of your decisions re: what customers want, what solutions are best, etc.

Which makes you even less appealing to other clients.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: