Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This should have been explored in its prime, not on its downfall.



The best time to plant a tree was twenty years ago. The second best time is now.


Companies are not trees that grow themselves.


If they tried to make money before the IPO it'd have only demonstrated how impossible it is for them to generate revenue.

Them actively searching for monetization strategies now seems to indicate an understanding that the capital well is running dry.


> Them actively searching for monetization strategies now seems to indicate an understanding that the capital well is running dry

Before they IPO'd they still had user growth. So they could get money from VCs by selling the "in 6 months we will have X million more users" story.

Now they're public, they don't have a growing user base, and the market expects them to stop losing money. They can't keep losing money forever as the VC option is gone now that they're public.


> demonstrated how impossible it is for them to generate revenue.

$2.5 billion in 2016



They have WAY too many employees. They need to cut half, and become profitable.


ability to get income/revenue should not be questioned though.


When was Twitter's "prime"? And how does it compare to today?


If I were to peg a time, its when they had many 3rd party applications that hooked into your feed. They killed the integrations off in favor of their own app because Advertising.


Personally before it enabled inline images which turned it into a firehose of reaction gifs.


I'm starting to fail to see the difference between 4chan and Twitter at this point. Twitter is just 4chan with avatars.


Pretty sure POTUS is not on 4chan, but I could be wrong.


Depends on how you use it. As far as I know, my local police service, train company etc aren't on 4chan


Yeah, or when they started.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: