Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

"(A) Each TNC operating in the City of Austin shall pay an annual fee calculated by the department based on one of the following methods of that TNCs choosing:

(1) The total of the permit fee paid by taxicab companies times the number of persons driving for the TNC;

(2) One (1) percent of the TNCs annual local gross revenues, or a comparable percentage of a TNCs portion of driver fares; or

(3) Based on total miles driven.

(B) Except for any TNC participating in the Safety Assurance Program, each TNC shall pay an additional fee of one (1) percent of the TNCs annual local gross revenue for the Compliant Driver Education Fund to be used to assist and incent drivers to become compliant."

Also, it was about much more than just fingerprinting. Fingerprinting was emphasized because it would have affected Uber and Lyft's business model the most by reducing the supply of drivers due to higher onboarding friction.

Here's the ordinance: https://www.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm%3Fid=245769

Some more interesting parts:

- "A TNC shall establish a driver-training program designed to ensure that each driver safely operates his or her vehicle prior to the driver being able to offer service"

- "during periods of abnormal market disruptions, dynamic pricing shall be prohibited."

- ...and the whole reporting section where they have to hand over all their internal operating data to the city




It seems like the money was going to be used to administer the industry, which seems fair?

A tax grab for me implies taking some money from some entity for a completely different reason. Like, paying for a civic ice rink with the money.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: