I thought this was about the Oculus / NDA issue and it very much is not in the legal sense, and I'm not really surprised to find out what the real situation is in this case.
As Carmack's musing on Facebook pointed out, he didn't like the outcome but he didn't have any grounding to factually dispute the NDA. So, tough as it may be, they lost.
This is about getting what is owed in contracts. Essentially the opposite side of the coin to an NDA (Can vs. Can't Do) and I hope he wins if he is truly being ripped off.
As Carmack's musing on Facebook pointed out, he didn't like the outcome but he didn't have any grounding to factually dispute the NDA. So, tough as it may be, they lost.
This is about getting what is owed in contracts. Essentially the opposite side of the coin to an NDA (Can vs. Can't Do) and I hope he wins if he is truly being ripped off.