Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Just to follow this up for people skimming:

A high-profile author of the policy is on camera --- video you can easily find for yourself --- saying that they were tasked with devising a Muslim ban, and that he is proud of the legal chicanery they employed to make it "legal".

This subthread, of course, an entirely off-topic divergence from the subject at hand.




I think "Trump's Travel Ban may be the first step to implementing Muslim ban" would be a fair headline for the topic. I agree with 'alva that news reports should make a clear distinction between what is, what was meant by that, and what some people say it might be.


Yes you are right that he had done so. And if he had signed into law a ban people coming to the country based on their religion, then the papers plastering "Trump enacts Muslim Ban" would be accurate. But that is not the case.


When was the last time you saw a law that was in plain English saying exactly what it did such as "No more Muslim immigrants"? The intention was clear, putting it in such obvious terms makes it obviously unconstitutional, so the language puts a few restrictions that accomplishes it as well they could.

Would you prefer if the headline was "Trump Wants Muslim Ban, Gets as Close as He Can"?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: