It's only the most inclusive possible development model if you narrowly define "inclusive" as "least technical friction for contribution".
Most people have a different notion of what inclusivity means, most notably having a welcoming UX with clear rubrics for contributions so that contributions have the best chance of actually being accepted.
When people complain about something being difficult for humans, promoting something that's easier on a technical level is turning a deaf ear.
No, I mean inclusive, because it does not require the contributor to identify in any way, it does not require the user to have mastered the UX du jour, and it does not require the user to even have a full copy of the git repository.
All you have to do is send your code, on whatever device you want, using open, standardized protocols.
Most people have a different notion of what inclusivity means, most notably having a welcoming UX with clear rubrics for contributions so that contributions have the best chance of actually being accepted.
When people complain about something being difficult for humans, promoting something that's easier on a technical level is turning a deaf ear.