I'm not arguing - I'm pointing out that it's obviously an arguable point wrt. obesity having an impact on others, since we obviously have functional countries with public health systems where that applies. There is no basis for dismissing it in the way you have.
More on topic, you don't seem to appreciate my point - we are not currently in food production, and there is no evidence that increased food availability would increase human population. So I'm not sure what point you are trying to make.
I'm not arguing
My dear Matthew. You clearly just like to argue.
I'm pointing out that it's obviously an arguable point wrt. obesity having an impact on others, since we obviously have functional countries with public health systems where that applies
Despite using "obviously" twice, having 'functional' countries that happen to have certain laws, as well as hundreds of thousands of others does not validate the laws. I'm not sure what the term for this is in formal logic, but it's probably along the lines of non-sequitur or as I prefer, pure simple mindedness.
More on topic, you don't seem to appreciate my point.
Ah, I see what it is you crave now.
we are not currently in food production, and there is no evidence that increased food availability would increase human population
I agree. That is not relevant. The point is that EVENTUALLY there will be a time when increasing food production would, once population catches up and there is more scarcity.
So I'm not sure what point you are trying to make.
More on topic, you don't seem to appreciate my point - we are not currently in food production, and there is no evidence that increased food availability would increase human population. So I'm not sure what point you are trying to make.