This is my opinion as to why not Haskell. I do on the whole prefer lazy languages where the parens are not mandatory, but let's be honest about the drawbacks.

So in Haskell you have "name1 name2 name3 name4 name5;" which is the application of some function to some arguments, of course, so this seems like a win compared to having to parenthesize the same thing. But when you have name1 name2 name3 + name4 name5, you had better want (name1 name2 name3) + (name4 name5) because that's the precedence. I think in some scenarios you can throw $ at the expression to get a more advantageous interpretation. And for fun you can do name1 name2 `name3` name4 name5 which will make things interesting.

And then there's name1 name2 . name3 name4 name5 which in some contexts might mean the coder is using point-free style, which is NOT named after a lack of periods. But point-free style is considered cool by some Haskellers.

Some LISPers like the long row of closing parens on the last line of a definition, so one man's meat, right?

There's no such thing as free syntax.

(I invite technical corrections, I'm still learning Haskell).