Look, the title was 100% click bait. The word Redis didn't even exist on the page linked. It deserved to get kicked off, as it was (certainly it wasn't just my flag that did it).
It's not a comment on your technology, architecture or approach.
But you're not sketching out a clear, 2 minute overview of what your approach is, with the pros and cons, and intended use cases. You're just throwing around random synthetic numbers, and apples to oranges comparisons. It's handwaving.
The title and content have been updated since I made these posts. The old headline was clickbait claiming the technology was 50x faster than Redis with no justification or analysis on the linked page.
Could you please explain yourself more? I tried to address these points earlier but I must have done a bad job at communicating, I apologize. Here:
(A) There is a 2 minute summary at the bottom of the page, with the pro/cons/dangers of benchmarking. But that doesn't mean benchmarking should be ignored, it is a legitimate science.
(B) My previous comment's (2) addressed the apples/orange, it would be nice if you could explain why it is handwaving when I tried preempt that directly (to which you ignored?).
(C) There is a fair question in my previous comment's (1), which you also didn't address - would you mind answering it?
I love having conversations with people. It would be easier for me to understand what you are trying to say, though, without being accused (ad-hominem) of being handwaving. Thanks, I look forward to hearing your thoughts.
It's not a comment on your technology, architecture or approach.
But you're not sketching out a clear, 2 minute overview of what your approach is, with the pros and cons, and intended use cases. You're just throwing around random synthetic numbers, and apples to oranges comparisons. It's handwaving.