yeah, the term I'd use is source available? anyway, I agree with the idea that "open source" is a dirty term, an attempt to subvert the free software movement. But that is a battle for another day.
Someone else put it better than I could:
> Likewise a Source Available is not necessarily Open Source, but Open Source is necessarily Source Available.
Someone else put it better than I could:
> Likewise a Source Available is not necessarily Open Source, but Open Source is necessarily Source Available.
https://haacked.com/archive/2006/07/26/CodeAvailableVsOpenSo... (requires you to accept github cert because https is difficult for some reason)
Blog github at https://github.com/Haacked/haacked.com