Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I hope we'll be 'Respect Your Freedom' compliant https://www.fsf.org/resources/hw/endorsement/respects-your-f.... This is of course trivial for our core SoC, where we have no intention of relying on binary blobs. It just may affect our selection of external parts, e.g. WiFi chips.

I often relate the way we're going about this to the early days of the GNU project. Our ultimate aim is an SoC where all of the RTL for every component is open source, though it may be that just like GNU which iteratively replaced proprietary components of Unix we may need to have some intermediate stepping stones. e.g. an SoC with a proprietary USB controller, until an appropriate open replacement can be written and verified.




The LowRISC FAQ says that the project will use a permissive open-source licence. Why are you choosing that over the GNU-style copyleft approach?


I've tried to answer that question here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13130195




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: