For those of you downmodding hga, the leaked emails contained conversations between some of the researcher that specifically talk about how to keep a scientist who disagree with them out of the peer reviewed press.
I think we have to stop considering Climate Research as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal. Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal.
The other paper by MM is just garbage. [...] I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow — even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!
I don’t really understand what’s incriminating about this. Please explain.
