Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I've been under the impression for a while now that unless you needed the super accurate timekeeping that ntpd provides (most don't) you're better off just using openntpd which should exist in most distro's repo's[1]. It's basically just "good enough" for everybody who doesn't need sub ms accurate time keeping.

[1] https://packages.debian.org/sid/openntpd




If you do need sub-ms accurate time keeping, then "just" running ntpd is not enough. You need to have a low-jitter connection to at least one stratum 1 server (if you don't know you have one, you don't), or a local clock. Otherwise, ntp doesn't give you more precision over openntpd -- only faster convergence after you've lost contact with servers for a few days.

If you don't know _exactly_ why you need ntpd, the default should be openntpd.


It probably depends on your operating system (or configuration manager, ancient SOE, etc) defaults.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: