Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

A single study with n=80, in a social psych journal, with a trendy soundbite conclusion? Of course it's not a false positive! The fact that the authors cite a paper by Jens Foerster is icing on the cake.



n=80 is actually not bad, if that's what you're implying. There are a lot of studies that are n=30 since that's the rule of thumb most follow.


The n isn't the bad part. I'm skeptical of all psych studies. Readers extrapolate too much from simple, controlled experiments.


I guess you think science would be better off just memory-holing results that you don't want to know about, is that right?


That's the problem - science already memory-holes results that don't fit the authors' view of reality.


I don't even know how you think that's related to this topic.




Consider applying for YC's W25 batch! Applications are open till Nov 12.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: