> What he is asking about is neither openness nor reproducibility (which are, indeed, very important). He is asking that researchers produce code that he can put into production.
That is 100% not what he's asking. I don't know how you could even interpret that as what he's asking.
He wants to be able to take your research and run it over an updating dataset to verify that the conclusions of said research actually still apply to that data.
That is 100% not what he's asking. I don't know how you could even interpret that as what he's asking.
He wants to be able to take your research and run it over an updating dataset to verify that the conclusions of said research actually still apply to that data.