Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This was what I was thinking when they first bought Boston Dynamic. Boston Dynamic was a huge DoD contractor. When Google bought Boston Dynamic, they explicitly said that they do not intend to be a military contractor and was expecting the existing contracts to expire [1].

The contracts that Boston Dynamic had with DoD expired in March 2015 [2]. My guess (BIG UNEDUCATED GUESS) is that the DoD doesn't take too kindly to its contractors not renewing its contracts and these military contracts contradict the corporate culture of Google. What's interesting is that they sold Boston Dynamic exactly a year after the DoD contract expired (donning conspiracy hat).

[1] http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/14/technology/google-adds-to-... [2] http://upstart.bizjournals.com/companies/innovation/2015/01/...




> My guess (BIG UNEDUCATED GUESS) is that the DoD doesn't take too kindly to its contractors not renewing its contracts

You may burn some bridges in your example but think of DoD like any other organization. If it's not getting the spotlight, there will be no hard feelings when things turn.



I'm going to go with Reuters for that story:

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-military-innovation-id...

Being that they were the source, best as I can tell.

summary: Schmidt joins board to help an "alphabet" US govt agency or two modernize their operations with industry best practices

editorial: This could be good or bad, depending on how things turn out. And for your weather forecast, it either will be rainy tomorrow, or it won't.

hn-cross-ref:

https://hn.algolia.com/?query=www.reuters.com%2Farticle%2Fus...




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: