Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Plain LXC, rut, or docker are probably closer.



I like docker, but I prefer something closer to a VM. Why would you say go for LXC over LXD?

Also, Googling "linux rut" doesn't bring up anything useful, I'm assuming you mean rkt


LXC is very nice. It's very VM-like and why I prefer it for almost everything I deploy instead of using Docker.

I know how to manage machines. I don't have the same confidence for Docker-images.

LXD seems to be a construction on top of LXC to make managing it easier "at scale", so if all you want is to manually be able to construct "container VMs" on demand, I think LXC is closer to what you actually want: It let's you manage the containers directly, near the iron, without anything getting in your way.

Don't get me wrong: LXD seems to have a genuine value-proposal, but for this use-case it seems to be a slight step of indirection, and my guess is that this will cause you more troubles than it's worth.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: