Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Difficult to believe that 'better social support' doesn't mean a government spending more money. Is the tax payer expected to fund people to 'safely enjoy drugs in moderation'?



Why not tax the drugs themselves to provide this support?


But we do. Alcohol and nicotine are taxed.


Why not require insurance to cover the costs? It is, after all, a product liability concern.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: