>The issue as best I see it is that there isn't any one cause here. So when you look at the roster of Silicon Valley CEOs and see row after row of white, male faces you could say that it's because tech is racist/sexist and prevents women/people of color from ascending to management positions in companies.
Or it could be that CEOs are likely to result from certain factors that were only open to white men historically, but whose factors have been fixed. Even if we waved a magic wand and fixed every discrimination problem ever tonight, tomorrow you'll still see the effects of past discrimination that would have to work their way out of society. So the question would then be, do we engage in further discrimination to try to counter act the effects of past discrimination?
Or it could be that CEOs are likely to result from certain factors that were only open to white men historically, but whose factors have been fixed. Even if we waved a magic wand and fixed every discrimination problem ever tonight, tomorrow you'll still see the effects of past discrimination that would have to work their way out of society. So the question would then be, do we engage in further discrimination to try to counter act the effects of past discrimination?