>Imagine if Apple, and the tech community as a whole, stood behind that decision.
You didn't counter his point. Again, its insane from a Game Theory perspective, it would require all players in the tech community to be effective, whereas if one person defects he now has access to a huge market where all the incumbents are gone.
Apple doing this would just mean "someone is going to create backdoor'd phones and capture the market, just not us", and we would get nowhere.
You didn't counter his point. Again, its insane from a Game Theory perspective, it would require all players in the tech community to be effective, whereas if one person defects he now has access to a huge market where all the incumbents are gone.
Apple doing this would just mean "someone is going to create backdoor'd phones and capture the market, just not us", and we would get nowhere.