Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Maybe the trick isn't to do process-per-tab or 1 content process and 1 UI process but to instead do some kind of "intelligent" number of content processes based on CPU and tab count? Like if you had 50 tabs on a quad core processor you could have 1 UI process and say five content processes?

Or another idea, have some kind of upper limit of memory a tab can use before it gets its own process.



That's likely what'll happen eventually. But we're starting with 1 content process because even that is a huge change and is going to cause disruption and will take a while to iron out the wrinkles.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: