> Art seems wrong to me as a descriptor because it would imply that I'm writing code for a sort of aesthetic beauty.
I think code can hold the same kind of beauty that math has when someone says that a proof is elegant, or a theory is beautiful. It's not a visual aesthetic, but appealing nonetheless.
Anyway, I think that the idea of programming as philosophy is interesting. I'll have to think about that more.
I think code can hold the same kind of beauty that math has when someone says that a proof is elegant, or a theory is beautiful. It's not a visual aesthetic, but appealing nonetheless.
Anyway, I think that the idea of programming as philosophy is interesting. I'll have to think about that more.