As part of senior leadership pushing for the war in Iraq under false pretenses, which killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, thousands of Americans, and burned nearly 2 trillion dollars, I'd say she's earned the adjective of "terrible human being".
Yes, we may not agree with his decisions - but I guarantee that if you go through history, you will find many political decisions that each of us would disagree with.
I may not like a lot of the decisions my political leaders make (I'm Australian).
However, I don't pretend for a second that political leadership is an easy calling - it's a tough job, and a lot of pressure - which can affect people in different ways.
I dislike armchair pundits who will dissect every decision, and then try to force it into their own black/white view of things.
At the end of the day, they made the call to topple Saddam Hussein, and take out Iraq.
I don't think anybody will argue that Saddam was a great human being, or that his regime wasn't responsible for atrocities - for me, the question was more that did we (well, America and its allies) have better things to do with their soldiers and money?
And look, we took out one dictator and put in a democratic government - and gave them aid and training - but it remains to be seen what they can make of it.
