Implications are that left mid-superior temporal cortex (LmSTC) carries information about sentence-level meaning, which had kind of already been implied in prior experimentation.
The discussion states that they "Provide preliminary evidence for a long-standing theoretical conjecture of cognitive science: that the brain, on some level, functions like a classical computer, representing structured semantic combinations by explicitly encoding the values of abstract variables", which is little more than hyperbole.
It's interesting, insofar as they identify a very specific region of the brain dedicated to a specific aspect of understanding language, and which plays a small role in a larger network of regions, but it's a bit of a stretch to imply that it's the "most important paper in cognitive neuroscience in many years". Pinker is quoted because this provides some empirical evidence for some of his theories.
I should also add when they mean "architecture" they mean it in the literal sense -- the physical structure in the brain in which encoding sentence meaning takes place.
The discussion states that they "Provide preliminary evidence for a long-standing theoretical conjecture of cognitive science: that the brain, on some level, functions like a classical computer, representing structured semantic combinations by explicitly encoding the values of abstract variables", which is little more than hyperbole.
It's interesting, insofar as they identify a very specific region of the brain dedicated to a specific aspect of understanding language, and which plays a small role in a larger network of regions, but it's a bit of a stretch to imply that it's the "most important paper in cognitive neuroscience in many years". Pinker is quoted because this provides some empirical evidence for some of his theories.