Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Protection results in a racket as its ultimate end. I see small studios and startups doing just fine right now without patents, which are expensive and require a lot of specialized knowledge to apply for. Who is being protected from what by patents, exactly?


I suppose it depends on how you define "expensive," but they really aren't. I believe the application fee is on the order of a few thousand dollars (in the US only, of course; you can easily rack up a hefty fee if you need to apply in multiple jurisdictions). Doing the actual application and enumerating the claims isn't trivial, but I do know laypeople who have successfully applied for and been granted patents with minimal help from a lawyer (that's where patent applications can get expensive).

EDIT: It's even less than I thought from the USPTO side; see http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/qs/ope/fee2009september1...


This. The only people who can afford and want to lawyer up with patents are exactly the people who shouldn't have them.

There are some rare exceptions, but continuing to punish the majority for their sake seems silly.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: