The providers can sell inclusion in the system prompt to advertisers. Run some ad-tech on the first message before it goes to the LLM to see whose gets included.
For most advertisers, sure, there's no need to go all the way back to the training data. Advertisers want immediate results. Training takes too long and has uncertain results. Much easier to target the prompt instead.
If you're someone like Marlboro or Coca-Cola, on the other hand, it might be worth your while to pollute the training data and wait for subtle allusions to your product to show up all over the place. Maybe they already did, long before LLMs even existed.
Even in their animations on this page there are things where the user scrolls the interface and the part under one of these glass buttons looks more exaggerated and draws the eye in an unpleasant way, and depending on where they land with it, the text on the button isn't particularly readable.
Even in the "protected against government searches" sense from the 4th Amendment, that right hardly exists when dealing with data you send to a company like OpenAI thanks to the third-party doctrine.
Private clubs have an exemption in several of the key civil rights laws, so they often can discriminate where businesses open to the public could not.
They can run into trouble when they allow the public to use their facilities, or grant membership so freely that they start to seem like they aren't really private.
SEC. 112207. TASK FORCE ON THE TERMINATION OF DIRECT FILE.
(a) Termination of Direct File.—As soon as practicable, and not
later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the
Secretary of the Treasury shall ensure that the Internal Revenue
Service Direct File program has been terminated.
The recent stay from the Supreme Court and especially its "oh but not the Fed" paragraph makes it all but certain that they're going to essentially overturn Humphrey's Executor (even though they may call it a "narrowing" instead).
"Killing" the service in the sense of minting new ones is no big deal and hardly merits mention.
Killing the existing ones is much more of a jerk move. Particularly so since Google is still keeping it around in some form for internal use by their own apps.
Don't they use https://g.co now? Or are there still new internal goo.gl links created?
Edit: Google is using a g.co link on the "Your device is booting another OS" screen that appears when booting up my Pixel running GrapheneOS. Will be awkward when they kill that service and the hard coded link in the phones bios is just dead
Hi-Fi Rush did some of the opposite: the gameplay in certain parts shrinks or stretches so it takes the right amount of time to hit the next musical cue.
reply