In addition to the sibling comment, you want to be able to check if the vehicle is charging and everything is fine remotely. EVs randomly stopping charging for various reasons is not rare at all. You want to get a notification.

You want to know when the vehicle finishes charging so you can vacate the public charger.

You want to be able to reduce the current when the charging is tripping breakers wherever you are.

VisionOS doesn't dominate anything.

Well it's quite difficult to come up with much better rules than Asimov's.

HPMOR offers a solution called 'coherent extrapolated volition' – ordering the super intelligent machine to not obey the stated rules to the letter, but to act in the spirit of the rules instead. Figure out what the authors of the rules would have wished for, even though they failed to put it in writing.

We are debating scifi, of course.

> Figure out what the authors of the rules would have wished for

What if the original author was from long ago and doesn't share modern sensibilities? Of course you can compensate when formulating them to some extent, but I imagine there will always be potential issues.

I did as well, "iskl" seems like an unsual english char sequence, at least compared to "ickl".

Speaking of which, iOS needs to finally support user accounts, ideally hidden ones as well.

And if you don't know about this, it's difficult to find out what's the problem.

Information wants to be free.

That's fine and dandy as part of a free as in beer ethos. When 'information' wants to pad the quarterly earnings statement of a gigantic corporation that exists only by grinding the suffering of fellow humans into a fine marketable paste I am somewhat less sympathetic. Information should be free. To people, for non-commercial use.

Perhaps. However, information won't be produced, if the already tenuous financial positions of authors is removed.

Things should be free, as in speech, not as in beer. Especially in this case. The giants of Silicon Valley could in fact purchase these rights.

Few authors care about people personally enjoying a product through otherwise means. They do care about mass distribution without attribution, without royalty, and without regard.

Information isn't copyrightable, at least in the US. Only creative works. But I get what you are saying.

In private companies people probably consider the issue to be 'less wrong'.

It's up to the owners and their management how they run it, right? So it's more about discrimination than government-style corruption.

I think it's certain that there will be positive and negative consequences and both of those will be on a large scale. I too am curious about the positives.

I think the negatives could have been easily minimized to more-reasonable-level without affecting the positive ones, if it wasn't headed by hothead Elon.

Apparently everyone survived (at least so far).

/r/aviation thread: https://old.reddit.com/r/aviation/comments/1irsmp8/airplane_...