Well, I don't get recommended spam and even if I do, I don't find it believable because I have a strong intolerance of bullshit my entire life and the algorithms pick up on that. So basically, don't tolerate bullshit.

Oh no, politics.

So is artificially limiting something for aesthetic reasons.

Until you can give concrete evidence, it's opinion and politics.

Opinion, yes. Politics? No.

Well, you can't address individual neurons unless you're a brain surgeon shining a laser at someone's individual neurons, but you can address individual memories through indirect references, surely 2^24 unique memories might take millennia to acquire and chances are I'd forget almost all of them. It's a quote by me, not a rule.

When are we gonna start spinning it?

Mental stability.

Almost as if the more of a deadbeat someone is, the higher they rise to the top.

Wrong, only once have I seen a useful ad in my entire life, and decided against buying it because I don't need it. I can reveal the ad if you ask, just don't want to be seen as a, dare I say, a tiser'.

> and decided against buying it because I don't need it

One anecdote doesn't refute science: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Bernays#Scientific_appr...

you could make a religion out of this! - By the guy behind the sun is a deadly lazer.